What term should security personnel never use to describe their services?

The term “peace officer” should not be used by security personnel to describe their services because it typically refers to sworn law enforcement officers who have the authority to enforce the law and maintain public peace. Peace officers possess specific legal powers and responsibilities that come with their official status, such as making arrests and carrying firearms, which security personnel do not have.

Using this term can lead to misunderstandings about the role and authority of security personnel, potentially creating confusion for the public regarding their actual responsibilities. It is important for security personnel to clearly communicate their function, which is primarily focused on providing security services and ensuring safety, rather than presenting themselves as law enforcement agents.

In contrast, terms like private investigator, security consultant, and court officer can be appropriate in specific contexts but do not carry the same implications of law enforcement authority as "peace officer." Security personnel should always use terminology that accurately reflects their training and the scope of their work to maintain public trust and clarity regarding their role.